being, doing, having: the journey is also the destiny
being. doing. having.
this is what i’m learning so far
as i journey through life.
the majority, however, choose a path
that is the opposite
of what i am learning:
having, doing, being.
first, they start with “having.”
they say, in effect:
“if i have enough wealth,
then i will be able to do
what i want to accomplish in life.”
second, they proceed with “doing.”
they say, “if i can do all the requirements
to attain a certain position, then
i will have power and freedom
to be the person i want to be.”
third, they focus on “being.”
they say, “i will be the person i want to be
if i can find the happiness and pleasure
this world can offer.”
the above path is the most popular approach.
i tried it, and it didn’t work for me.
why?
growing up with scarce resources,
i didn’t have much.
if i based what i can do
on what i did have,
i would not have done much.
if i were not able to do much, then
i could have not grown up into
the kind of the person i dreamed to be.
i say, it should be:
first, being.
second, doing.
third, having.
i will always start focusing on my “being”—
this is about who i am.
this is about character development.
this is about determining
the bases of my identity.
who am i?
where did i come from?
where am i going?
i will proceed by focusing on “doing”—
this is about what i can do.
this is about my career, my abilities,
my accomplishments, my occupation.
i will continue by focusing on “having”—
this is about the products of what i do.
this is the sum total of all the resources that
have been entrusted to me
as a steward-manager
of my time, talents, and treasures.
being determines doing;
doing determines having.
it’s not the other way around.
i haven’t achieved exactly
the dream i have
about the person i want to be.
but so far, i have been
enjoying the journey.
and the journey is as important
as the destination.
in the path of being, doing, and having,
the journey is also the destiny.
this is what i’m learning so far
as i journey through life.
the majority, however, choose a path
that is the opposite
of what i am learning:
having, doing, being.
first, they start with “having.”
they say, in effect:
“if i have enough wealth,
then i will be able to do
what i want to accomplish in life.”
second, they proceed with “doing.”
they say, “if i can do all the requirements
to attain a certain position, then
i will have power and freedom
to be the person i want to be.”
third, they focus on “being.”
they say, “i will be the person i want to be
if i can find the happiness and pleasure
this world can offer.”
the above path is the most popular approach.
i tried it, and it didn’t work for me.
why?
growing up with scarce resources,
i didn’t have much.
if i based what i can do
on what i did have,
i would not have done much.
if i were not able to do much, then
i could have not grown up into
the kind of the person i dreamed to be.
i say, it should be:
first, being.
second, doing.
third, having.
i will always start focusing on my “being”—
this is about who i am.
this is about character development.
this is about determining
the bases of my identity.
who am i?
where did i come from?
where am i going?
i will proceed by focusing on “doing”—
this is about what i can do.
this is about my career, my abilities,
my accomplishments, my occupation.
i will continue by focusing on “having”—
this is about the products of what i do.
this is the sum total of all the resources that
have been entrusted to me
as a steward-manager
of my time, talents, and treasures.
being determines doing;
doing determines having.
it’s not the other way around.
i haven’t achieved exactly
the dream i have
about the person i want to be.
but so far, i have been
enjoying the journey.
and the journey is as important
as the destination.
in the path of being, doing, and having,
the journey is also the destiny.

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home